Hello...Hello? just testing

TTT test

test Numba 2

test
djajdjalkdjlkasjkl
sdsdsddsd

fdfd

yeehaaaa!!!!

testies!

test

test

test2

test


j

I HATE TESTS!

but more then tests

I HATE PORNBOTS!

testing....

whoo-hoo! 600!

testing...

Test!

Hi. I'm new here and I just want to say that I like everything at this forum.

Okay I am new and this is my first post, looking for some help on a name of a childrens book that had been reviewed in an old BUST.....Does any one remember the name the book about a doll and some bears, it was all very arty and black and white photos and the cover was in a pink gingham check? It was written/photographed probably in the late 50's early 60's and the lady who wrote it was a bit daft and I think the doll's name began with a 'D' .
Help I want to find it for my new baby girl.
I am unsure what forum to post this in though.....

The Book is the Lonely Doll by Dare Wright. If I'm correct

testing? it's my first time trying to post a pic......

http://www.flickr.com/photos/denyba/sets/72157601549369627/

Our Wedding

BOLD

small size

LARGE SIZE

COLOR

Georgia

Strikethrough

Underline Text

Underline Text

deleted

new photo

blah

just seeing if my new avatar works.

Ugh, I don't understand what I'm doing wrong. I uploaded a new picture but it's like...it just shows a distorted version of my old one.

Hit refresh on your browser and you'll see it. I see it after doing that.

Anytime I see someone's avatar looking a little stretched, I figure they changed it. Hit the refresh and it's all good.

yay, it worked! thanks, polly.

Testing..... Testing....

nevermind

Actually, it's posting under 3 names- I got oodles of comments from "MissLips", so block that one, too!

Crap, not sure how you formatted that GT, to go directly to my ignore list, so here's a link to the profile!

Remember to IGNORE POSTS and BLOCK PM'S!!

BLOCK TROLL: filibuster
BLOCK TROLL: dustbuster

to format it to go directly to the ignore list, just do what you do to block anyone, then add a step:
1)click on their name when they post, on the pull down select view member profile
2)underneath the member profile click options on the pull down select ignore user
3)when that page comes up, go to the address window. select then copy.

the address for blocking a member is universal so that address takes all members to the block screen with the proper information. i'll add miss lips to my post retroactively and follow up on all his new posts.

thanks for the info polly. you're a peach!

.

[updown]Hello![/updown]
[scroll]Hello![/scroll]
[fade]Watch me fade away![/fade]
[rainbow]Happy Birthday!!![/rainbow]
[img]http://www.omgblog.com/images/lady-bunny-vag.jpg[/img]
uh...oops!

think that's offensive? how about some

[img]http://chaoskids.com/BABY/graphics/dance.gif[/img]
[img]http://www.123glitter.com/glitter-maker/2008/07/02/429502028583022020708.gif[/img]

but i think you're missing something here, bob, there is nothing terribly exciting about palin's nom. and to be honest there was nothing exciting about ferraro's either. they were picked. it wasn't something they earned. the race hillary ran, i will be the first to tell you was sloppy, but that is the real watershed event for women. it wasn't some guy giving her a hand up, it was her kicking down the door herself. i dislike hillary, but that, that i think is fantastic. if palin had done so much i would be cheering for her too, but let's be honest, there were, are far more qualified women in the gop *ahem* pot party, snowe, hutchensen or dole spring to mind, all of whom have experience that rivals clinton. but they weren't chosen. not because they didn't have the political acumen, not because they wouldn't move the right's base, but because they were experienced.

make no mistake, palin was chosen because she had no experience, little record, and she is the ideal of what a woman should be to the right. she was-- is-- essentually a cypher. a pretty empty (in both senses of the phrase) vessel to be filled in with what-have-you, or a blank canvas to be painted with a broad brush. why wouldn't women find that offensive? she is the ultimate token. don't get me wrong, she can deliver a speech, but lets be honest, being the mayor of a po-dunk down compared to the mind it takes to go to harvard law school and be the editor of their law review, and become a law professor? that's some serious wattage.

it makes absolutely no sense to be proud of something you didn't earn. it's like an heir being proud of the fortune he never made. what did he do for it? he just won the genetic lottery. nothing more. the same is true of palin. she really never earned that spot, so it really is no accomplishment. it does little practially in the way of furthering the feminist cause, particularly when she doesn't think women are capable of making their own choices where birthcontrol is involved.

it makes absolutely no sense to be proud of something you didn't earn. it's like an heir being proud of the fortune he never made. what did he do for it? he just won the genetic lottery. nothing more. the same is true of palin. she really never earned that spot, so it really is no accomplishment. it does little practially in the way of furthering the feminist cause, particularly when she doesn't think women are capable of making their own choices where birthcontrol is involved.

it makes absolutely no sense to be proud of something you didn't earn. it's like an heir being proud of the fortune he never made. what did he do for it? he just won the genetic lottery. nothing more. the same is true of palin. she really never earned that spot, so it really is no accomplishment. it does little practially in the way of furthering the feminist cause, particularly when she doesn't think women are capable of making their own choices where birthcontrol is involved.

it makes absolutely no sense to be proud of something you didn't earn. it's like an heir being proud of the fortune he never made. what did he do for it? he just won the genetic lottery. nothing more. the same is true of palin. she really never earned that spot, so it really is no accomplishment. it does little practially in the way of furthering the feminist cause, particularly when she doesn't think women are capable of making their own choices where birthcontrol is involved.

it makes absolutely no sense to be proud of something you didn't earn. it's like an heir being proud of the fortune he never made. what did he do for it? he just won the genetic lottery. nothing more. the same is true of palin. she really never earned that spot, so it really is no accomplishment. it does little practially in the way of furthering the feminist cause, particularly when she doesn't think women are capable of making their own choices where birthcontrol is involved.

it makes absolutely no sense to be proud of something you didn't earn. it's like an heir being proud of the fortune he never made. what did he do for it? he just won the genetic lottery. nothing more. the same is true of palin. she really never earned that spot, so it really is no accomplishment. it does little practially in the way of furthering the feminist cause, particularly when she doesn't think women are capable of making their own choices where birthcontrol is involved.


block this troll here:anti-femicist link
block this troll here:

http://www.bust.com/lounge/index.php?act=u...e&uid=28911[/font][/font]

·´¯`.·â€¢ââ„¢£â€¢·.·´¯` *¨¨*:•.ââ„¢¥.•:*¨¨* âËϠ·.¸¸.·´¯âËœ… ".-:¦:-" (¯`·.*?*.·´¯) `·.·â€¢ââ„¢¥â€¢ •°ââ„¢¥â€¢° âËϠ°o*•°o *•ââ„¢¥_xXx_ââ„¢¥â€¢* o•°°â€¢o
(¯`·.×°x°×____âËœ…. •o°â€¢* *•°o•.âËœ…_____×°x° ×.·´¯)

Avatar check--please disregard

Keep the faith, baby.

testing for the photo problem other people are having.

[img]http://img291.imageshack.us/img291/4548/img2185jj8.jpg[/img]

ETA: Yep, same problem.

If it has to be fixed anyway, can one of the PTB explain why we can't post a file from our computers directly, why everything has to have a URL? Very annoying.

oh brother bother.

well, not my problem.

Holy Schnikeys!

Does the bleeping avatar work yet? *le sigh* Test.

Yes!

thanks for sharing!

do set to ignore!